JMD Conference & Exhibition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published online as doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2007.070032 on October 4, 2007

Published online before print October 4, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmoldx.2007.070032v1
9/5/563    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicastri, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicastri, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, S. J.
Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2007, Vol. 9, No. 5
Copyright © 2007 American Society for Investigative Pathology & Association for Molecular Pathology
DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.070032

Is Occult Lymph Node Disease in Colorectal Cancer Patients Clinically Significant?

A Review of the Relevant Literature

Daniel G. Nicastri*, John T. Doucette*, Tony E. Godfrey* and Steven J. Hughes{dagger}

From the Departments of Surgery and Community and Preventive Medicine, * Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; and the Department of Surgery, {dagger} Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

The clinical significance of micrometastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) to regional lymph nodes remains controversial. In this review, we analyze publications that have evaluated the clinical significance of occult lymph node metastasis in CRC. An extensive literature search identified 19 publications that evaluated the clinical significance of micrometastatic CRC by various methods, including immunohistochemistry (IHC; n = 13) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR, n = 6). These studies were reviewed for methodology and findings. Significant limitations in methodology were identified, including inconsistent histological definitions of micrometastatic disease, poor sampling because of an inadequate number of lymph nodes or number of sections per lymph node analyzed, lack of conformity with respect to IHC antibody or RT-PCR marker, and inadequate power because of small sample size. Micrometastatic lymph node metastasis identified by RT-PCR was consistently found to be prognostically significant, but this was not true of micrometastatic disease identified by IHC. RT-PCR analysis of lymph nodes with specific markers can help identify pN0 (pathological-negative lymph node) CRC patients at increased risk for recurrence. The identification of occult disease by IHC techniques may also ultimately prove to be associated with worse outcome, but a number of inadequately powered studies have concluded conversely.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
INT J SURG PATHOLHome page
C. S.-C. Wong, M.-T. Cheung, B. B.-Y. Ma, E. Pun Hui, A. C.-L. Chan, C.-K. Chan, K.-C. Lee, W. Cheuk, M. Y.-Y. Lam, M. C.-K. Wong, et al.
Isolated Tumor Cells and Circulating CK20 mRNA in pN0 Colorectal Cancer Patients
International Journal of Surgical Pathology, April 1, 2008; 16(2): 119 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology.