| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |








From the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory,
*
Department of Pathology, and the Comprehensive Cancer Center,
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; the Public Health Practice Program Office,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Coriell Cell Repositories,
Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey; the Molecular Genetics Laboratory,
¶
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; the Department of Pathology,
||
Ohio State University Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; the Department of Medical Genetics and the Department of Pathology,
**
University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee; the Department of Medicine,

University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; and the Department of Health Science,

Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reliable, high-quality control material for genetic testing can be provided by stably transformed B-lymphocyte cell lines derived from blood from subjects with genetic disease mutations. Lymphoblastoid cell lines are used extensively by proficiency testing groups, and many cell lines of this type are available in repositories such as the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) collection, maintained by the non-profit Coriell Institute for Medical Research (Coriell; http://cimr.umdnj.edu). However, control materials for many mutations of public health importance can be difficult to obtain. For example, in 2001, the American College of Medical Genetics recommended a core panel of 25 mutations to be used in general population screening for cystic fibrosis,3 yet positive genetic material for several of these mutations is not routinely available through public sources. Current and future genetic testing needs could be met in part by developing a standardized process to create control cell lines with mutations of interest.
Residual, clinical blood samples hold promise as a sustainable, economical source of B-lymphocytes for the development of lymphoblastoid cell lines with important mutations. The use of residual samples avoids the need to draw additional blood, which can be problematic, particularly when pediatric or incapacitated patients are involved. Also, residual samples can be made completely anonymous, so Institutional Review Board (IRB) procedures are simplified. Because of the numerous samples processed by many clinical testing laboratories, it may be possible to obtain less common mutations, which are especially valuable.
In this study, we investigated the feasibility of developing Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B-lymphocyte cell lines from residual, anonymous clinical blood samples that had been determined in the course of standard clinical testing to contain mutations of public health importance. Blood lymphocytes transform readily, and numerous EBV transformation protocols have been developed.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Coriell has developed protocols for EBV transformation of both fresh and cryopreserved blood lymphocytes that have success rates of 94% and 90%, respectively. These protocols use two 10-ml Vacutainer tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) of blood with acid citrate dextrose (ACD) as the anticoagulant, and the samples are maintained at ambient temperature during transit and processed within 6 days of collection. The transformation success rate approaches 100% for any given sample if additional transformation attempts are made using lymphocytes frozen and stored at the time of initial sample processing.9
Most EBV transformation protocols use freshly drawn blood or freshly frozen blood or lymphocytes. Residual clinical blood samples, however, may be 2 to 3 weeks old by the time a mutation is identified, and clinical samples vary with respect to blood volume, anticoagulant, storage temperature, and other factors that could affect transformability. A high transformation success rate was observed at Coriell for samples up 6 days old,9 however, and we thought it likely that some residual clinical blood samples would also transform successfully. We wished to determine the transformation success rate for residual clinical samples, and also to identify the sample variables that were important predictors of transformation success.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We solicited blood samples drawn in either ACD or ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), in age ranges of 1 to 7, 8 to 14, and 15 to 21 days from venipuncture to initiation of transformation. The submitting laboratories provided information on age of the sample, anticoagulant used, storage temperature, sample volume, patient age and patient sex. We also recorded whether the sample hemolyzed before transformation was initiated. Although all of the samples had been originally submitted for clinical testing for a mutation or disease of interest, testing results were not always available at the time samples were submitted to this project; therefore some samples could have been negative.
EBV transformation was attempted on 34 samples. EBV shed by a marmoset cell line (GM07404; NIGMS Human Genetic Cell Repository) was used as the transforming agent as previously described,9 with modifications as necessary to accommodate variations in blood sample volume. Briefly, blood was diluted 1:1 with RPMI 1640, layered onto a Histopaque-1077 Hybrimax gradient (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and centrifuged. The lymphocyte layer was harvested and resuspended in culture medium containing EBV and the mitogen phytohemagglutinin (PHA; Sigma-Aldrich). In cases where small sample volume or hemolysis of the sample made purifying the lymphocytes impractical, the sample was mixed directly with culture medium containing EBV and PHA. Medium was replenished twice weekly, and the cultures were monitored for signs of transformation (increased cell growth, cell aggregates, or clumping), which were generally apparent within 3 to 8 weeks in successful cultures. The culture medium was antibiotic-free to increase the likelihood that contamination would be readily detected. Transformed cultures were grown to approximately 1 x 108 cells, then cryopreserved in heat-sealed borosilicate glass ampules (20 1-ml ampules of five million viable cells each), and stored in liquid nitrogen (liquid phase). "Successful" transformations were free from bacterial, fungal, and mycoplasmal contamination and were viable after cryopreservation, as evidenced by a doubling of the cell number within 4 days of recovery. Samples that did not show obvious signs of transformation were discarded after an average of 167 ± 6 (SEM) days in culture.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Statistical analysis was performed to determine which sample variables were reliable predictors of successful transformation. Six of the 34 submitted samples were excluded from the analysis, including one successful transformant. One of the excluded samples had been stored for 21 days at ambient temperature before transformation was attempted, and exhibited bacterial contamination shortly after culture with EBV was initiated. The culture was destroyed before the outcome was evident. The other five excluded samples were part of a set of six samples from a single donor, where blood drawn in both EDTA and ACD was aged for 7, 14, and 21 days (see Table 1
). One randomly selected sample from this set was included in the statistical analysis. We assessed the relationships of the individual sample variables to transformation success using exact inference analyses, either Fishers exact test, or the Cochran-Armitage exact test for trend as appropriate (Table 2
). We found a statistically significant relationship between age of the sample and the chances of successful transformation (P = 0.002). Samples that were from 1 to 7 days old at the time of setup had a higher transformation rate (67%) than older samples (38% for 8 to 14 days; 0% for >14 days), suggesting a linear relationship between age of sample and success rate. Samples collected in ACD were somewhat more likely to transform than those collected in EDTA, (P = 0.095), and unhemolyzed samples appeared more likely to transform than hemolyzed ones (P = 0.098). Sample volume, sample storage temperature, and age and sex of the donor were not significantly related to transformation success by this analysis.
|
|
Sample age was strongly associated with transformation success, so we re-examined the effects of selected other variables using a logistic regression model that would assess the simultaneous effects of sample age, anticoagulant, and storage temperature. Hemolysis was not included in this multivariate analysis because the strong association with sample age would result in numerical instability in the estimation procedure. Due to the relatively small number of samples, and the association between anticoagulant and storage temperature, two separate models were developed, one including sample age and anticoagulant and one including sample age and storage temperature. The age of the sample was treated as a continuous variable. In both models, the age of the sample was found to be a significant predictor of successful transformation (P = 0.017 and P = 0.011). In the two separate models, after adjusting for sample age, the effect of both anticoagulant and storage temperature approached statistical significance (P = 0.070 and P = 0.087, respectively). Samples in EDTA and those stored at room temperature were less likely to transform.
The effect of sample age on transformation success is illustrated by the results of six separate transformation attempts using aged blood from a single donor (Table 1
). Several tubes of blood from a single draw (both EDTA and ACD tubes) were stored at 4°C and transformation was initiated for blood with both anticoagulants at 7, 14, and 21 days. Both of the 7-day-old samples transformed successfully; however, none of the 14- or 21-day-old samples transformed.
Our results demonstrate that residual clinical blood samples are a potential source of B-lymphocytes for establishing stably EBV-transformed lymphocyte cell lines. Sample age was the strongest predictor of transformation success for a given sample, with success rates of 67%, 38% and 0% for samples aged 1 to 7, 8 to 14 and 15 to 21 days, respectively. When the age of the samples was included in a logistic regression model, the effects of anticoagulant and storage temperature approached statistical significance, with samples drawn in ACD and samples stored at 4°C more likely to transform. Although sample hemolysis was associated with a lower transformation rate, hemolyzed samples were also typically older samples, so it is not clear whether hemolysis itself affected transformation or was a confounder due to its association with sample age. One hemolyzed sample did transform successfully, indicating that hemolysis alone does not preclude successful transformation. Sample volume and the age and sex of the donor did not influence the likelihood of successful transformation.
Based on these findings, we suggest that the following criteria be used to identify residual blood samples that are good candidates for EBV transformation: samples should be no more than 14 days old (preferably no more than 7 days old) and should have been stored under ambient conditions or at 4°C for samples up to 7 days old and at 4°C only for samples 8 to 14 days old. Both ACD and EDTA appear to be acceptable as anticoagulants. Although samples in ACD were more likely to transform than those in EDTA, three of the ten successful cell lines were derived from samples in EDTA. We also recommend a minimum volume of 1.0 ml to facilitate sample handling. In this study, samples that conformed to these guidelines had a transformation success rate of 63% (10 of 16).
It is not known why younger samples are more likely to transform, although a likely possibility is that the number of viable B-lymphocytes decreases as the sample ages. Thus, the number of viable B-lymphocytes in a residual sample may be a useful predictor of transformation success. It is also not known if the increased time in culture needed to establish a transformed cell line from residual as opposed to freshly drawn blood samples is due to initially fewer viable B-lymphocytes, slower proliferation rates for the lymphocytes once transformed, or a combination of these or other factors.
It has been reported that although EBV-transformed lymphoblast cell lines are stable in culture, they are not truly immortal, and generally cease proliferating before 160 population doublings have been reached.10, 11 One-hundred sixty population doublings would, however, provide an extremely large quantity of genetic material. Appropriate archiving of seed stocks during early expansion of the cultures should obviate this potential limitation in the use of EBV-transformed cell lines as reliable sources of control materials.
In summary, we have shown that residual clinical blood samples can provide viable lymphocytes for the establishment of EBV-transformed cell lines with mutations of public health importance. We achieved a transformation success rate of 63% (10 of 16) for samples up to 14 days old. Successful samples up to 7 days old had been stored under ambient conditions or at 4°C; all successful samples 8 to 14 days old had been stored at 4°C only. The cell lines established in this study were all derived from residual samples no more than 14 days old, so this approach is likely to be most successful for mutations that can be detected clinically within this time frame. To maximize the utility of these types of cell lines as control materials for molecular genetic testing, work is in progress to verify the stability of cell line mutations in culture and to validate cell lines in various clinical testing settings.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by contract no. 200-2000-10050 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government.
Timothy T. Stenzels current affiliation is Vysis, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Downers Grove, IL.
Accepted for publication July 9, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Amoli, D Carthy, H Platt, and W. Ollier EBV Immortalization of human B lymphocytes separated from small volumes of cryo-preserved whole blood Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(suppl_1): i41 - i45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. O. Meyrick, D. B. Friedman, D. D. Billheimer, J. D. Cogan, M. A. Prince, J. A. Phillips III, and J. E. Loyd Proteomics of Transformed Lymphocytes from a Family with Familial Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2008; 177(1): 99 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Bernacki, J. C. Beck, K. Muralidharan, F. V. Schaefer, A. E. Shrimpton, K. L. Richie, B. C. Levin, G. Pont-Kingdon, and T. T. Stenzel Characterization of Publicly Available Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines for Disease-Associated Mutations in 11 Genes Clin. Chem., November 1, 2005; 51(11): 2156 - 2159. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Bernacki, J. C. Beck, A. K. Stankovic, L. O. Williams, J. Amos, K. Snow-Bailey, D. H. Farkas, M. J. Friez, F. M. Hantash, K. J. Matteson, et al. Genetically Characterized Positive Control Cell Lines Derived from Residual Clinical Blood Samples Clin. Chem., November 1, 2005; 51(11): 2013 - 2024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jarvis, R. K. Iyer, L. O. Williams, W. W. Noll, K. Thomas, M. Telatar, and W. W. Grody A Novel Method for Creating Artificial Mutant Samples for Performance Evaluation and Quality Control in Clinical Molecular Genetics J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2005; 7(2): 247 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Grody Quest for Controls in Molecular Genetics J. Mol. Diagn., November 1, 2003; 5(4): 209 - 211. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |