| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Review |
From the Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Perhaps no other clinical laboratory has undergone the marked changes in technology that the clinical histocompatibility laboratory has in the past decade. Serum screening has moved from HLA antigen targets on cell panels constructed from volunteers and commercially available frozen cells to flow cytometric detection of antibodies bound to microspheres coated with partially purified HLA antigens and to ELISA-based methods.2 Cross-matching has transitioned from microlymphocytotoxicity-based assays assessing complement mediated cell lysis due to recipient anti-HLA antibodies coating donor cells to more sensitive flow cytometric-based tests.3 Finally, HLA antigen detection by serological assays is being gradually replaced by nucleic acid-based methods for identification of HLA alleles. New technology for antibody screening and cross-matching has been described in the references cited above. The focus of this review will be the polymorphism, clinical significance, and methods for detection of HLA alleles within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
HLAallele identification could reasonably be proposed as the most complex
contemporary problem in molecular diagnostics. First, more than 1300
alleles are now known to be present in worldwide populations at 12
expressed Class I and II loci.4
The encoded polypeptides
of these alleles differ from each other by one or more amino acid
substitutions by what are effectively missense mutations. No other
human genetic loci are as polymorphic as the HLA loci. For example, the
HLA-B locus currently has more than 400 known alleles (Table 1)
. Second, the steady description of new alleles plagues laboratories as
allele calls made in the past for patients and donors become out of
date. Third, laboratories are asked to provide allele identification at
various levels of resolution for different clinical situations. High
resolution allele level typing is required for unrelated bone marrow
transplantation while serological or low resolution typing is adequate
for renal transplantation.
|
| The Major Histocompatibility Complex |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Class I genes include HLA-A, -B, and
-C and the non-classical MHC-Ib genes HLA-E,
-F, and -G. HLA-E, -F, and
-G are expressed at lower levels than the classical genes,
do not display the extensive polymorphism of the HLA-A,
-B, and -C genes, and appear to have more limited
functions in the immune system. The Class II genes include 18 closely
linked loci that code for the
and ß chains of the class II
molecules. The most clinically relevant of these are the
DRA, DRB1, DQA1, DQB1, and
DPA1, DPB1 genes encoding the DR,
DQ, and DP heterodimers, respectively.
The Class I and the Class II genes are all members of the immunoglobulin gene family and have arisen via gene duplication and divergence from a common ancestor over time. They demonstrate significant sequence homology. This fact, and the reality that several of these genes have closely related pseudogenes with errors preventing successful transcription and translation necessitate care in designing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for molecular diagnosis to ensure locus specific amplification.
| Structure and Function of the Class I and II Molecules |
|---|
|
|
|---|
chain encoded by the HLA-A, -B,
or -C gene locus non-covalently bound to ß-2
microglobulin, encoded by chromosome 12. The
-1 and
-2 domains
contain variable amino acid sequences and form a cleft designed to bind
peptides formed by protein degradation (Figure 1)
|
chain non-covalently
associated with a ß chain encoded by the A and B gene loci,
respectively, in the MHC.7
For example the DP heterodimer
is encoded by the DPA1 and DPB1 genes. For Class
II, both the A and the B genes contribute to
variable
-1 and ß-1 domains that form a peptide binding cleft
(Figure 1)Class I molecules are expressed in all nucleated cells and platelets, while Class II molecules are found primarily on antigen processing cells such as dendritic cells, B lymphocytes and macrophages, although they can be induced in several cell types.
The fundamental role of Class I and II molecules is to bind to self and non-self peptides and transport them to the plasma membrane of cells for recognition by the T cell antigen receptor.8 Autoimmunity is avoided by several mechanisms to delete or suppress T cells which bind with high affinity to self peptides in the context of an individuals Class I and II molecules. However, viral and bacterial peptides displayed by the Class I and II molecules to T cell antigen receptors generally result in an immune response. Class I molecules bind 810 amino acid peptides primarily resulting from proteosome degradation of cytoplasmic proteins and present these peptides to CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. Thus Class I molecules are a primary means of alerting T cells to virally infected cells. Class II molecules bind 1325 amino acid peptides largely resulting from endosomal degradation of exogenous and endogenous proteins and present these peptides to CD4+ T helper cells. Class II molecules play an important role in eliciting immune responses to organisms such as pyogenic bacteria. CD8+ and CD4+ T cell activation by these two routes results in cell division and differentiation resulting in cellular and antibody mediated immune responses.8
| Nomenclature |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Once nucleic acid-based information regarding the sequence of alleles
became available, a nomenclature complementary to the serological terms
was devised (Table 2)
. The first two digits of an allele name refer to the underlying
serological specificity and the third and fourth digits indicate a
specific allele sequence. For example, HLA-A*0205 and A*0210
are alleles encoding distinct polypeptides within the A2 serotype.
These two alleles both encode the epitope recognized by the anti-A2
antisera but have 5 nucleotide differences elsewhere in exons 23
resulting in amino acid variations. Alleles within a serological group
may vary from each other by a single or by several nucleotides. For
Class II molecules, both the A and the B genes
may contribute to antigen variability. Thus a DR15 serotype may be
found in an individual with one of the DRB1*15 alleles such
as DRB1*1501 and DRA*0101. When necessary, a
fifth digit is used to identify silent polymorphisms and the sixth and
seventh digits are used to denote variation occurring outside of coding
regions, such as the promoter and introns. Null allele sequences which
result in either no or reduced levels of functional HLA molecules
because of transcription changes, aberrant RNA splicing, and frame
shift and nonsense mutations, or in frame termination codons are
designated by an allele number appropriate to the group and the letter
N. Individuals with null alleles may have discrepancies between
serological and DNA-based typing. This problem has clinical
implications since an inappropriate donor may be sought if more than
one laboratory using different techniques are involved in typing a
recipient and potential donors.
|
| Nature of Class I and II Gene Polymorphism |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The great majority of the polymorphism found in the Class I and II
genes occurs in the exons that encode the
-1 and
-2 (Class I,
exons 23) and the
-1 and ß-1 (Class II, exon 2) domains which
bind processed peptides.12
Some nucleotide positions in
these exons are invariant, others may have two or three or even all
four of the possible bases as possibilities (Figure 2)
. Thus, some codons are constant while others display varying degrees
of variability. Since the polymorphic exons are relatively short in
length (about 250 nucleotides), they can easily be amplified in the PCR
for molecular diagnostic studies.
|
| Emergence of New Alleles |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Clinical Significance |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several medical and organizational strategies have made successful transplantation possible:
1. A relatively simple solution is to identify an HLA identical sibling, taking advantage of the fact that there is a one fourth chance of HLA identity with each sibling. Unfortunately, many potential transplant recipients do not have access to these donors.
2. Powerful inhibition of the immune response via direct suppression of T cell activation and other strategies have made organ transplantation possible even in the face of significant serological HLA mismatches with living related and unrelated and cadaver donors.16
3. However, better HLA-A, -B, and -DR matching at a serological level generally increases the half life of the transplanted organ and decreases overall morbidity.17 Thus cadaver donor kidneys are shared on a national basis with waiting recipients who have no mismatches.
4. Bone marrow transplantation poses special problems since the transfer of hematopoietic stem cells can result in graft-versus-host disease as well as rejection. Evidence is accumulating that survival decreases and the risk of severe graft-versus-host disease increases following stem cell transplantation when even subtle, allele level, donor-recipient HLA mismatches are present.18, 19 Which mismatches are permissible and which HLA loci are relevant is still controversial and major retrospective studies are underway to address these questions.20 In the absence of HLA identical siblings, finding donors of hematopoietic stem cells largely matched at an allele level is facilitated by the several million enrolled potential donors with known HLA types in the National Marrow Donor Program in the United States and similar programs in other countries.11
Disease Association
A number of diseases are associated with specific HLA alleles and
their encoded antigens. The pathophysiology of these autoimmune
disorders is incompletely understood, although one hypothesis suggests
that the Class I and II heterodimers encoded by specific HLA alleles
have distinct abilities to present autoantigens to the T cell receptor
in a manner leading to an aberrant immune response.21
Some HLA allele-disease associations are quite strong and diagnostically useful. More than 95% of patients with narcolepsy have the DQB1*0602 allele,22 while 25 to 30% of unaffected Caucasian populations have this allele. Similarly, 90% of patients with ankylosing spondylitis have B*27 alleles, while 5 to 10% of the normal population do.21 The risk of developing ankylosing spondylitis for individuals with a B*27 group allele is about 3%, a relative risk 100-fold greater than in individuals without B*27. DQB1*0602 confers a similar magnitude risk of narcolepsy. Since these alleles are common in the population at large, HLA testing is most useful in helping to rule out narcolepsy or ankylosing spondylitis when these diagnoses are considered but the DQB1*0602 or B*27 alleles are not present.
HLA antigens associated with most other autoimmune disorders carry relative risks of disease that are lower than those seen in narcolepsy and ankylosing spondylitis. Thus, the association of DRB1*03/*04 with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and a shared DRB1*04 encoded epitope with severe rheumatoid arthritis have limited diagnostic utility, but provide insights into the pathological basis of these diseases. For complex disorders such as AIDS, HLA alleles may confer resistance or susceptibility to disease progression and there may be dosage effects. For example, recent studies have suggested that homozygosity at HLA loci and/or the presence of A*29, B*35-Cw*04, B*54, *55, and *56, and DRB1*11 are associated with more rapid progression, while HLA locus heterozygosity and/or the presence of B*14 and Cw*08 are associated with longer latency periods.23, 24 This is a challenging area of inquiry given the complexity of these disorders and variations in the ethnicity of the populations studied, the subtypes of HIV-1 involved, and the definition of cases and controls.
Finally, the MHC includes genes associated with familial disorders as a consequence of the presence of pathological mutations. The CYP21 gene encodes the 21-hydroxylase enzyme involved in steroid hormone metabolism. CYP21 mutations are found in individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The HFE gene encodes a Class I-like polypeptide which associates with ß-2 microglobulin. Rather than binding processed peptides, HFE interacts with the transferrin receptor to regulate iron stores. Mutations in HFE are found in genetic hemochromatosis. Because of linkage disequilibrium, individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia and genetic hemochromatosis have increased frequencies of specific HLA alleles. Direct CYP21 and HFE genotyping is preferred for the molecular diagnosis of these disorders.25, 26
| Methods for Detection of Class I and II Alleles |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sequence Specific Oligonucleotide Probe Hybridization (SSOPH)
Polymorphic regions of the Class I and Class II genes are
amplified from genomic DNA with the PCR, using primers that anneal to
5' and 3' flanking regions that are conserved among individuals. Care
must be taken in choosing primers that will result in roughly equal
amplification of the two alleles in a heterozygous individual.
Following PCR, the amplified DNA is used in standard dot-blot
hybridization assays with sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes
chosen to interrogate regions of polymorphism.28
High
stringency conditions allow detection of single nucleotide differences
between alleles. Alleles are assigned on the basis of patterns of
positive and negative hybridization reactions with oligonucleotides
specific for a particular allele or sequence. SSOPH typing requires a
substantial number of oligonucleotide probes to detect and distinguish
among the large number of known Class I and II alleles; the exact
number depends on whether allele level or serological level resolution
is required. Alternatively, reverse line-blots employ multiple
oligonucleotide probes specific for alleles of interest immobilized on
a single membrane.29
The development costs for reverse
hybridization assays are substantial; thus these kits are generally
available commercially rather than as locally developed reagants.
Sequence-Specific Primer PCR (SSP-PCR)
PCR primers are designed so that their 3'-most 12 nucleotides
are complementary to base positions within Class I and II genes that
differ for different alleles.30
For a particular SSP-PCR,
productive DNA amplification occurs if an allele perfectly
complementary to the two primers chosen is present in genomic DNA. By
choosing a series of primers assessing polymorphism at the relevant
regions within exons 23 and exon 2 of the Class I and II genes, an
HLA typing can be accomplished. SSP-PCR requires about 100
simultaneously performed PCR assays per patient to identify
HLA-A, -B, and -DRB allele groups at
serological equivalent resolution. More reactions are required if
higher resolution typing is desired. In each reaction, a second set of
primers directed at a non-HLA locus serves as a positive control. The
presence or absence of PCR products of the correct size is then
assessed by gel electrophoresis. Because of the large number of
reactions and possible alleles, most laboratories use local or
commercial software for analysis and calling alleles. SSP-PCR is most
useful for serologic level resolution HLA typing and is widely used in
laboratories supporting organ transplantation.
Direct DNA Sequencing of PCR Products
The SSOPH and SSP-PCR approaches above both suffer from the
limitations of the need for large numbers of probes or primers and for
frequent updating in response to newly published alleles. Direct
sequencing is increasingly attractive as a general method for HLA
typing. If amplification primers are carefully chosen to amplify all
alleles present in a population, any known or currently unknown allele
should be detectable by direct sequencing of the PCR products. Most
alleles are uniquely defined by polymorphisms in exons 23 (Class I)
or exon 2 (Class II); therefore, laboratories typically include at
least these exons in their amplification products. Since the PCR
approach used usually results in amplification of both alleles present
at a locus, the electropherograms generated must be high quality to
clearly display each position of heterozygosity. Advances in the ease
of use of automated DNA-sequencing instruments, high quality DNA
polymerases and fluorescent dyes for sequencing reactions, and powerful
analysis software have made this method more attractive for clinical
and research HLA allele identification.31
DNA sequencing
remains technically challenging and most laboratories continue to use
the SSP-PCR and SSOPH methods described above. The development of
non-electrophoretic methods is likely to make DNA sequencing practical
for a larger fraction of clinical laboratories; however, the
application of techniques such as sequencing via oligonucleotide arrays
to HLA allele identification is in its infancy.
In choosing a method for HLA typing, laboratories must consider several factors. SSP-PCR and reverse SSOPH can be performed in a time (45 hours) appropriate for clinical situations such as cadaver renal transplantation. SSP-PCR and reverse SSOPH are useful for low and moderate typing volumes while forward SSOPH is attractive for very large clinical volumes or batched research typing. With considerable effort and numerous primers and probes, SSP-PCR and SSOPH can achieve allele level resolution; however, direct DNA sequencing is the most general and precise means of high resolution typing. Finally, serological typing remains useful for correlation of serological results with DNA-based results and in investigating the possibility of the presence of null alleles.32
Assessing the Accuracy of HLA Typing Methods
The complexity of HLA allele identification necessitates care to
ensure high quality results. Detailed and frequently updated standards
for DNA-based HLA typing are maintained by the American Society for
Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI).33
The joint
College of American Pathologists (CAP)/ASHI and the South Eastern Organ
Procurement Foundation programs offer proficiency testing to
laboratories. More than 130 laboratories currently participate in the
CAP/ASHI nucleic acid-based Class I and II surveys. Laboratories may
type challenge samples at either serological equivalent or allele level
resolution. In general, more than 95% of laboratories are able to
accurately identify the intended types in each sample. The most
difficult aspect of the surveys appears to be the allele level Class I
challenges. The rapidly increasing number of known Class I alleles
poses difficulties for laboratories attempting to unambiguously
identify alleles at these loci.
To mimic the clinical testing environment, whole blood samples are provided to laboratories for proficiency testing. This requirement makes it logistically difficult to provide survey samples that test the ability of laboratories to detect unusual alleles or difficult heterozygous combinations. A number of laboratories participate in the University of California at Los Angeles DNA Exchange. This educational exchange provides DNA samples for testing representing a spectrum of common, rare, and newly described alleles from an extensive collection of cells.34
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Accepted for publication June 5, 2001.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Tong, T. W. Tan, and S. Ranganathan Methods and protocols for prediction of immunogenic epitopes Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2007; 8(2): 96 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Tong, T. W. Tan, and S. Ranganathan In silico grouping of peptide/HLA class I complexes using structural interaction characteristics Bioinformatics, January 15, 2007; 23(2): 177 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Barrett, K. S. Gustafson, J. Wang, S. Z. Wang, and G. D. Ginder A GATA Factor Mediates Cell Type-Restricted Induction of HLA-E Gene Transcription by Gamma Interferon Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2004; 24(14): 6194 - 6204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. De Vreese, R. Barylski, F. Pughe, M. Blaser, C. Evans, J. Norton, G. Semana, R. Holman, P. Loiseau, D. Masson, et al. Performance Characteristics of Updated INNO-LiPA Assays for Molecular Typing of Human Leukocyte Antigen A (HLA-A), HLA-B, and HLA-DQB1 Alleles Clin. Vaccine Immunol., March 1, 2004; 11(2): 430 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |