JMD 2000, Vol. 2, No. 4
Copyright © 2000 American Society for Investigative Pathology & Association for Molecular Pathology
Use of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for Bone Marrow Engraftment Analysis
Dwight H. Oliver*,
Richard E. Thompson
,
Constance A. Griffin*
and
James R. Eshleman*
From the Division of Molecular Pathology of the Department of Pathology,
*
and the Department of Oncology,
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore; and the Department of Biostatistics,
Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Allogeneic bone marrow transplant engraftment assays use
polymorphisms in the human genome to determine the relative percentages
of donor and recipient cells present in the recipient. We describe a
novel posttransplant assay approach using single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs), the most common type of polymorphism in
humans. Using samples of defined genotype, we used real-time
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and allele-specific fluorescent TaqMan
probes to assay a SNP of the cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 gene.
Standard curves of chimeric mixes showed a linear relationship between
the ratio of two alleles and the ratio of their respective fluorophore
emission, except for mixes with a low percentage (<5%) of the
less common allele. We validated the SNP real-time PCR assay by
comparing it to Southern hybridization analysis, analyzing DNA
mixes in a blinded fashion with both methods. The correlation between
the two methods was high. We have produced a statistical model that
varies allele frequency to predict how many SNPs would be required to
produce a functional SNP panel. Additional development will be
necessary to produce such a panel of highly informative SNPs for
clinical use. A real-time PCR SNP assay may ultimately provide more
accurate quantification and shortened turnaround time compared to
current post-engraftment assays.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Monitoring bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients requires analysis
of posttransplant samples to quantify the percentage of engraftment,
evaluate for minimal residual disease, and detect early recurrence.
Current assays determining percentage of engraftment take advantage of
the genetic polymorphisms that exist between individuals. The earliest
of these assays, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis
(RFLP)-Southern blot, used radioactive probes to anneal to large
genomic DNA fragments of up to 25 kb.1, 2, 3, 4
Subsequent
assays used the variability of short, repetitive, non-coding sequences in human
DNA to differentiate donor from recipient in engraftment specimens.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the DNA encompassing
minisatellites, or variable number of tandem repeats
(VNTR)5, 6, 7
and microsatellites, or short tandem repeats
(STR)5, 8, 9, 10
results in amplicons of different lengths,
depending on the number of repeats within the sequence. However,
drawbacks to these techniques exist, including variable test
sensitivity due to somewhat subjective comparison of autoradiographic
band intensities (in RFLP or VNTR analysis by Southern hybridization)
or ethidium-stained band intensities (in PCR-based assays using VNTRs
and STRs). The limit of detection of these techniques is variable,
ranging from approximately 5 to 10% for Southern-RFLP to 1 to
2% for minisatellite and microsatellite
analysis.1, 5
Finally, many assays require substantial
post-PCR analysis such as restriction enzyme digestion,
agarose/acrylamide gel electrophoresis, or automated sequence analysis,
all of which increase turnaround time.
In this paper, we present an alternate method of engraftment analysis
using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). SNPs are pairs of alleles
which vary at a single DNA basepair. They constitute 90% of all
polymorphisms in the human genome, occurring at an average rate of
1/1000 bp.11
Unlike the repeating sequences of VNTRs and
STRs, SNPs are non-repetitive sequences, and can be found in both
coding and non-coding regions of the genome. Interest in SNPs has
surged as a result of applications in the mapping of cancer and other
disease genes, population genetics, and
pharmacogenomics.11, 12, 13, 14
Databases, both public (National
Center for Biotechnology Information) and private (pharmaceutical),
have been established to catalog the growing number of identified
SNPs.11
The purpose of our experiments was to develop a rapid, highly sensitive
method of quantifying bone marrow engraftment in patients without the
need for subjective interpretation of assay results or post-PCR
analysis. We focused on SNPs because of their prevalence and
suitability to quantification by fluorogenic oligonucleotide probes. We
describe a novel technique using multiplex real-time PCR amplification
of a well-characterized, common, biallelic SNP located within the
cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 gene.15
We
used an assay containing two oligonucleotide reporter probes (allele
1-specific and allele 2-specific) and a detection system that is linear
over at least five orders of magnitude.16
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Patient Samples, DNA Isolation, and Chimeric Mixes
Archival DNA previously harvested from the peripheral blood (18
cases) or bone marrow (2 cases) of 20 clinically healthy patients was
used for this study. DNA isolation was done by NP40 detergent
(Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) lysis of cells, sodium dodecyl
sulfate/proteinase K digestion, 5 mol/L NaCl extraction, and
ethanol wash.17
DNA used in real-time PCR reactions was
further purified by double phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol
extraction, ammonium acetate precipitation, and ethanol
wash.18
DNA concentrations were determined
spectrophotometrically using the average of A260
measurements from two dilutions. Using these concentrations, DNA from
two different samples were mixed in various ratios in preparation for
Southern and real-time PCR analysis.
CYP2C9 Genotype Assessment by
PCR-AvaII-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
To identify samples of known genotype, we performed CYP2C9
genotyping on 50 ng of patient DNA using previously reported PCR
primers and conditions,19
in a final reaction volume of 50
µl. Twenty-five microliters of this product were digested with 12
units of AvaII (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA) for 8
hours at 37°C, followed by electrophoresis on an 8% acrylamide gel.
The primers identified by Stubbins et al,19
which we have
also used, generate a PCR product that does not contain a second,
nonpolymorphic AvaII restriction site. The diagnosis of an
allele 2 homozygote would, therefore, be susceptible to a false
positive in the event of restriction enzyme failure or inhibition.
Accordingly, if one were to employ the RFLP assay for clinical use, the
primers would have to be redesigned to incorporate such an internal
control cut site. To confirm the genotype determined by RFLP analysis,
undigested amplicons were also sequenced using a Big Dye sequencing kit
(PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and products analyzed on a PE
Biosystems ABI 310 Gene Sequencer.
Real-Time PCR SNP Analysis at the CYP2C9 Locus
SNP analysis was also performed using a real-time PCR CYP2C9
allelic discrimination TaqMan assay (PE Biosystems), with minor
modifications. The assay includes proprietary nonlabeled forward and
reverse primers along with two proprietary fluorescent TaqMan
oligonucleotide probes (allele 1-specific probe labeled with VIC
fluorophore, allele 2-specific probe labeled with FAM
(6-carboxy-fluorescein fluorophore). The VIC and FAM reporter dyes are
covalently attached to the 5' terminal base of the two probes and the
nonfluorescent quencher dye is attached near the 3' ends. The probes
are capable of differentially binding to the amplicons generated during
PCR and selectively reporting their respective alleles.20
All PCR reactions were run in triplicate, and contained 100 ng of
patient DNA, 12.5 µl of TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix, and 2.5 µl
of Allelic Discrimination Mix. Appropriate negative controls were also
run. Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence
Detection System (SDS, PE Biosystems) using the following conditions:
50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes, and then 40 cycles of
amplification (92°C denaturation for 15 seconds, 62°C
annealing/extension for 60 seconds). The annealing temperature was
empirically determined (data not shown) to promote high binding
specificity of the probes without loss of assay sensitivity. For each
cycle, the SDS software determines the
Rn, which is the
normalized (ie, compared to a passive reference fluorophore)
fluorescent signal from the VIC- or FAM-labeled probe. For our analysis
we used the
Rn value after the final cycle, because it proved more
reliable than the cycle at which the threshold was crossed
(CT value, data not shown). The
RnFAM/
RnVIC
fluorophore signal ratio (hereafter abbreviated FAM/VIC) was calculated
for each individual real-time PCR reaction, and means with standard
deviations were determined for the triplicate runs.
RFLP-Southern Analysis
Three micrograms of DNA were digested with HinfI (New
England BioLabs), run on an agarose gel, transferred to a Zeta-Probe
nylon membrane (Biorad, Hercules, CA) and hybridized with a
32P-labeled D1S7 (MS-1) minisatellite
probe21
using standard techniques.22
The
percentage of each patients DNA was determined using a
Molecular Dynamics (Sunnyvale, CA) 445SI PhosphorImager.
Statistical Calculation of Loci Informativity
Two methods for calculating informativity are described (Table 1)
. In method A, only homozygotes are considered informative, whereas
with method B, both homozygotes and heterozygotes are considered
informative. For initial calculations, we assumed a theoretical optimal
SNP allele frequency of 50% in a population (p = q = 0.5).
For method A, the probability that a given donor is homozygous for the
p allele is 0.25 (p2 =
0.502) from the Hardy-Weinberg relationship
(p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1). The
probability that the recipient is homozygous for the q allele is
0.25, yielding a combined probability of 0.0625. Informativity is also
obtained if the donor is qq and the recipient is pp
(probability also equal to 0.0625). Therefore when only
homozygosity is considered informative, the total informativity of this
SNP is twice that value, 0.125 or 12.5%.
In method B, both homozygotes and heterozygotes are considered
informative (Table 1)
. The relative frequencies of each informative
genotype are calculated with the same optimal SNP. Together they
provide an overall informativity of 62.5%, when the allele frequency
of p is 0.5. Similar calculations using methods A and B were repeated
for lower p allele (and correspondingly higher q allele) frequencies.
Assuming an informativity of i for each SNP and independent assortment
of SNPs, the binomial theorem indicates the probability that a given
donor-recipient pair will yield at least one informative locus when n
loci are evaluated is:
Assuming an i informativity and assembly of a panel of n SNPs, the
probability of having y number of loci be informative is given by the
general formula:
 |
Results
|
|---|
CYP2C9 SNP Genotyping of Samples
To assess the utility of using SNPs and real-time PCR for
engraftment analysis, we first determined the genotype of the SNP at
the 440 bp position of the P450 CYP2C9 gene in
patient samples using the RFLP method described by Stubbins et
al.19
Allele 1 (CYP2C9*1) contains a C at the 440 bp
position, whereas allele 2 (CYP2C9*2) contains aT (Figure 1A)
. This method entailed PCR amplification of DNA, AvaII
digestion, 8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and identification
of characteristic band patterns. In our study population of 20 patients
we found 4 (20%) heterozygotes, consistent with the 19% heterozygous
frequency of this SNP reported in general population
studies.19, 23
All other patients in our study were allele
1 homozygotes; no allele 2 homozygotes were found in our limited
population. Results of three representative samples are shown in Figure 1B
. Because no internal AvaII restriction site control is
present within the amplified product, the undigested PCR products shown
in Figure 1B
were sequenced to confirm their identity (data not
shown). These patient samples with defined genotypes were then used
for subsequent real-time PCR analysis.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. CYP2C9 SNP structure and sample characterization/genotyping.
A: A single nucleotide polymorphism
(SNP) in the CYP2C9 gene
contains a C (allele 1)
or T (allele 2) at the
locus. The C T alteration destroys an AvaII
(GGACC) site.
B: A 190-bp fragment containing the SNP was PCR-amplified,
digested by AvaII, and run on a polyacrylamide
electrophoresis gel. The allele 1 sequence contains an AvaII
site and is digested into 75-bp and 115-bp fragments; the site is lost
in allele 2, so this amplicon remains 190-bp after digestion.
Heterozygous DNA produces 190-, 115-, and 75-bp fragments. Examples
from three different individuals are shown before and after cutting
with AvaII.
|
|
Real-Time PCR Analysis
To demonstrate whether SNPs could be used to accurately report
donor/recipient ratios in the post-BMT setting, we created mock mixed
chimeras using samples of established genotype. Such DNA mixes
are commonly used as accurate representations of cell chimeras in a
variety of engraftment analyses.1, 2, 5, 8
The TaqMan assay
contained two probes that could discriminate alleles differing at only
a single base (Figure 2)
. DNA mixes of two allele 2/allele 1 heterozygous samples were diluted
into an allele1 homozygous sample at proportions of 100, 90, 80, 70,
60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 5, 3, 1, and 0% heterozygote (equivalent to
50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5, 2.5, 1.5, 0.5, and 0%
allele 2). Real-time PCR was then performed using the conditions
detailed above, and two standard curves of % allele 2/% allele 1
versus FAM/VIC ratio were generated (Figure 3)
. These two parameters showed a linear relationship in both standard
curves (r2 = 0.987 and
r2 = 0.977), except in the mixes with
the lowest percentage of allele 2 (<5%). Thus, changes in the ratio
of allele 2 (FAM fluorophore) to allele 1 (VIC fluorophore) in a DNA
mix results in a predictable change in the ratio of intensities emitted
by their corresponding fluorescent probes after PCR amplification. The
plots from both mock chimeras were almost superimposable (within the
limits of pipetting and spectrophotometry error), indicating that the
standard curve is reproducible and perhaps applicable to other patient
mixes as well. If such is the case, generating standard curves for each
individual patient may not be necessary.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Real-time PCR allelic discrimination of the CYP2C9 SNP. SNPs affect
fluorescent probe binding to complementary DNA, allowing discrimination
of two alleles. Probes that are a perfect complement to the target DNA
hybridize and are digested by the 5' 3' exonuclease activity of
Taq polymerase, separating VIC or FAM reporter from the
quencher. Single base mismatched probes do not bind at this relatively
high annealing temperature
(non-hybridize), remain
intact, and do not report, due to quenching of FAM or VIC
fluorescence.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Fluorophore emission after real-time PCR amplification of DNA mixes.
Standard curves were generated by mixing DNA from two allele 2
heterozygotes into an allele 1 homozygote in varying proportions, and
then performing real-time PCR. The calculated FAM/VIC ratio was plotted
with respect to the known percentage of allele 2/percentage of allele 1
in the corresponding mix. Error bars indicate 1 SD for triplicate runs.
The standard curves allow extrapolation of % allele 2/% allele 1
(x-axis)
in unknown specimens using the measured FAM/VIC ratio
(y-axis).
|
|
Assay Validation Compared to Southern Blotting
We validated our assay against a classic BMT engraftment assay,
RFLP-Southern blot using a D1S7 minisatellite probe. In this
comparison, the same homozygous and heterozygous patient DNA used above
were mixed in new proportions and run as blinded unknowns in both the
TaqMan SNP and RFLP-Southern blot assays. The FAM/VIC ratio calculated
from each mix in the SNP assay was translated to % allele 2/% allele
1 by extrapolation from the consensus standard curve of Figure 3
. In
the RFLP-Southern blot assay, % allele 2/% allele 1 was determined by
phosphoimager analysis. Overall, the results of the two assays were
highly correlated (r2 = 0.971),
as shown in Figure 4
.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Validation of the real-time PCR SNP assay with the Southern blot assay.
The real-time PCR SNP assay
(TaqMan) is compared to
Southern blot by running mock chimeric mixes of 100, 74, 62, 43, 28, 9,
and 0% heterozygous DNA using both techniques, evaluated in a blinded
fashion. The correlation coefficient between the two assays is 0.971,
and the slope of the regression line is 1.004.
|
|
Number of SNPs Required for a Clinical Panel
We developed a statistical model to determine how many SNPs should
be included in a screening panel designed to assay for post-BMT
engraftment. In our initial calculations, we assumed an optimal
informativity for a given SNP, with an allele frequency of 50% (p = q = 0.5). We applied the Hardy-Weinberg relationship
(p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1) to
determine the frequency of a given genotype. Calculations were done
using two different definitions of informativity.
In method A, only homozygotes are considered informative such that only
two of the nine possible allele combinations are informative (Table 1)
.
A given pair of individuals is informative if one person is homozygous
for one of the alleles and the other is homozygous for the other
allele. Under these conditions, we found the total informativity of an
optimal theoretical SNP to be 0.125, or 12.5% (see Materials and
Methods). If we assume that multiple SNPs would be analyzed before
transplantation, how many would be required to find an informative
locus in the majority of donor-recipient pairs? Assuming independent
inheritance (no linkage disequilibrium) and applying the binomial
theorem, we calculated that if only five optimal SNPs are analyzed,
only 49% of random donor-recipient pairs will be informative for one
of them. For 10 SNPs, 74% will have at least one informative locus,
and for a panel of 25 SNPs, 96.5% of pairs will have at least one
informative SNP. With a panel of 25 SNPs, the probability of finding no
informative alleles is only 3.5%, and the average number of
informative SNPs is expected to be about 3 (25 x 0.125).
In method B, both homozygotes and heterozygotes are considered
informative. In this setting, six of the nine possible combinations are
informative (Table 1)
, resulting in an overall informativity of the
single optimal SNP of 62.5%. Accordingly, far fewer SNPs would be
required to produce a functional panel for monitoring BMT engraftment.
Only three SNPs would provide an overall informativity of almost 95%;
with four SNPs, 98% of donor-recipient pairs would be informative for
at least one SNP. Transplantation between family members would require
a larger number of SNPs to be screened to achieve these same levels of
informativity. Thus, including informative heterozygotes in these
analyses has a profound effect on the number of loci required to
achieve a reasonable overall informativity.
Effect of Allele Frequency on SNP Panel Size
The number of SNPs required in a panel is determined in part by
the allele frequency of p and q in the population. Using various allele
frequencies of 2 to 50%, we have calculated the number of SNPs needed
to compose a panel so that at least one of the SNPs would be
informative between the donor and recipient 95% of the time (Figure 5)
. Using method B to define informativity, altering the p
allele frequency from 0.20 to 0.50 has very little effect on the number
of SNPs required. Method A is more dependent on variations in allele
frequency. Allele frequencies below 30% using method A, or below 2%
using method B, would require analysis of too many SNPs to be
practical.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Variation in allele frequency alters the number of SNPs required in a
panel. The allele frequency of p was varied from 50% to 2% with a
corresponding increase in q. The number of SNP loci that must be tested
in each donor and recipient sample in order to be more than 95%
certain of finding at least one informative SNP is indicated for
various frequencies of the p allele in a population. Data are
calculated and graphed using both method A and method B
(see Materials and
Methods).
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Several assays have been developed previously to follow the
transplantation of donor bone marrow into a recipient to document
engraftment and monitor for disease relapse. There are an extensive
number of probes available for RFLP-Southern analysis, such that an
informative locus can nearly always be found, even in cases involving
discrimination of siblings.1
The typical assays, however,
are costly and time-consuming. Techniques exploiting amplification of
polymorphisms containing small repeats (minisatellites and
microsatellites) are confounded by polymerase slippage and require
post-PCR analysis. Unfortunately, microsatellite and minisatellite
analyses are not readily analyzable by real-time PCR using fluorescent
probes.
In this report we provide evidence that SNPs can be used to monitor BMT
engraftment. Nearly any SNP can be used in this assay; our choice of
the CYP2C9 SNP was based solely on the frequency of the polymorphism
and the availability of the primers and probes in a commercially
available system. For clinical use, multiple SNPs would have to be
evaluated as a panel in the donor and recipient by the real-time PCR
assay, before transplantation, to identify an informative locus. How
one defines informativity (homozygotes only versus both
homozygotes and heterozygotes) has a profound effect on the number of
SNP loci required for analysis. In method A, a panel of 23 highly
informative SNPs would need to be run to be >95% certain that at
least one SNP was informative, whereas in method B, only about 4 such
loci are required to achieve a similar level of confidence. Method B is
also much less sensitive to allele frequencies lower than the 50%
theoretical optimum. Once an adequate SNP locus is identified which
distinguishes the donor from the recipient, all posttransplant assays
would then be run using only one of the informative SNPs identified.
The linear relationship between the percentage of allele 2 present in a
chimeric mix and the FAM/VIC emission ratio becomes curvilinear at the
lowest levels of percentage of allele 2 in Figure 3
. This may represent
nonspecific binding of some FAM probe to allele 1 DNA due to a relative
excess of allele 1 DNA. Additional experiments with mixes of known
allele 2 homozygotes will need to be performed with optimal
probes to further define the actual limit of detection of the SNP
real-time PCR approach. With further optimization, the SNP based
real-time PCR assay may attain the limit of detection of microsatellite
and minisatellite based assays currently in use.
BMT engraftment assessment using the real-time PCR SNP assay described
herein may prove to be an improvement over current engraftment assays.
Because the ABI 7700 can discriminate probe signals and measure them
over a range of several orders of magnitude,16
relatively
small amounts of recipient DNA should be detectable in a posttransplant
marrow specimen. Fortunately, our data suggest that standard curves may
extrapolate to other patients (ie, will not be patient-specific),
though this will need to be confirmed with additional patient samples.
Furthermore, the assay requires only minute amounts of DNA (100 ng, as
typically obtained in cytopenic bone marrow specimens), does not
require donor-recipient sex mismatch or radioactivity, and circumvents
differential amplification of unequal length alleles. Finally, a
real-time PCR-based assay has the potential to reduce technologist
time, improve turnaround time, and consequently reduce medical cost.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank David Proud, Ph.D., Ed Siekierski, and the PE Biosystems
technical support service for helpful discussions and guidance with the
ABI Prism 7700; Karin Berg, M.D. and Janice Priest, Ph.D. for
insightful discourse and critical review of the manuscript; and Cynthia
Glaser, Mike Hafez, and Elizabeth Wentz for assistance with the
Southern blots.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Address reprint requests to James R. Eshleman, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Pathology, Ross Building, Room 632, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21205. E-mail: jeshlem{at}jhmi.edu
Supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants KO8
CA66628 and RO1 CA81439 (to J. R. E.).
Accepted for publication August 30, 2000.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Leclair B, Fregeau CJ, Aye MT, Fourney RM: DNA typing for bone marrow engraftment follow-up after allogeneic transplant: a comparative study of current technologies. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995, 16:43-55[Medline]
-
Blazar BR, Orr HT, Arthur DC, Kersey JH, Filipovich AH: Restriction fragment length polymorphisms as markers of engraftment in allogeneic marrow transplantation. Blood 1985, 66:1436-1444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Knowlton RG, Brown VA, Braman JC, Barker D, Schumm JW, Murray C, Takvorian T, Ritz J, Donis-Keller H: Use of highly polymorphic DNA probes for genotypic analysis following bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1986, 68:378-385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yam PY, Petz LD, Knowlton RG, Wallace RB, Stock AD, de Lange G, Brown VA, Donis-Keller H, Blume KG: Use of DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms to document marrow engraftment and mixed hematopoietic chimerism following bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1987, 43:399-407[Medline]
-
Scharf SJ, Smith AG, Hansen JA, McFarland C, Erlich HA: Quantitative determination of bone marrow transplant engraftment using fluorescent polymerase chain reaction primers for human identity markers. Blood 1995, 85:1954-1963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sreenan JJ, Pettay JD, Tbakhi A, Totos G, Sandhaus LM, Miller ML, Bolwell B, Tubbs RR: The use of amplified variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) in the detection of chimerism following bone marrow transplantation: a comparison with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) by Southern blotting. Am J Clin Pathol 1997, 107:292-298[Medline]
-
Stuppia L, Calabrese G, Di Bartolomeo P, Peila R, Franchi PG, Morizio E, Palka G: Retrospective investigation of hematopoietic chimerism after BMT by PCR amplification of hypervariable DNA regions. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1995, 85:124-128[Medline]
-
Frankel W, Chan A, Corringham RE, Shepherd S, Rearden A, Wang-Rodriguez J: Detection of chimerism and early engraftment after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation by short tandem repeats. Am J Hematol 1996, 52:281-287[Medline]
-
Oberkircher AR, Strout MP, Herzig GP, Fritz PD, Caligiuri MA: Description of an efficient and highly informative method for the evaluation of hematopoietic chimerism following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995, 16:695-702[Medline]
-
Nuckols JD, Rasheed BK, McGlennen RC, Bigner SH, Stenzel TT: Evaluation of an automated technique for assessment of marrow engraftment after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using a commercially available kit. Am J Clin Pathol 2000, 113:135-140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brookes AJ: The essence of SNPs. Gene 1999, 234:177-186[Medline]
-
Kwok PY, Gu Z: Single nucleotide polymorphism libraries: why and how are we building them? Mol Med Today 1999, 5:538-543[Medline]
-
Garber K: More SNPs on the way (news). Science 1998, 281:1788[Free Full Text]
-
Vilain E: CYPs, SNPs, and molecular diagnosis in the postgenomic era (editorial; comment). Clin Chem 1998, 44:2403-2404[Free Full Text]
-
Smith G, Stubbins MJ, Harries LW, Wolf CR: Molecular genetics of the human cytochrome P450 monooxygenase superfamily. Xenobiotica 1998, 28:1129-1165[Medline]
-
Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Williams PM: Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res 1996, 6:986-994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989:pp 9.16-19.19 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor NY,
-
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989:pp E3-E14 NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor
-
Stubbins MJ, Harries LW, Smith G, Tarbit MH, Wolf CR: Genetic analysis of the human cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 locus. Pharmacogenetics 1996, 6:429-439[Medline]
-
Livak KJ: Allelic discrimination using fluorogenic probes and the 5' nuclease assay. Genet Anal 1999, 14:143-149[Medline]
-
Wong Z, Wilson V, Patel I, Povey S, Jeffreys AJ: Characterization of a panel of highly variable minisatellites cloned from human DNA. Ann Hum Genet 1987, 51:269-288[Medline]
-
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989:pp 9.30-9.57 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor NY,
-
Miners JO, Birkett DJ: Cytochrome P4502C9: an enzyme of major importance in human drug metabolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998, 45:525-538[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Gineikiene, M. Stoskus, and L. Griskevicius
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based System Improves the Applicability of Quantitative PCR for Chimerism Monitoring
J. Mol. Diagn.,
January 1, 2009;
11(1):
66 - 74.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-L. Liang, M.-T. Lin, M. J. Hafez, C. D. Gocke, K. M. Murphy, L. J. Sokoll, and J. R. Eshleman
Application of Traditional Clinical Pathology Quality Control Techniques to Molecular Pathology
J. Mol. Diagn.,
March 1, 2008;
10(2):
142 - 146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Hurtle, E. Bode, D. A. Kulesh, R. S. Kaplan, J. Garrison, D. Bridge, M. House, M. S. Frye, B. Loveless, and D. Norwood
Detection of the Bacillus anthracis gyrA Gene by Using a Minor Groove Binder Probe
J. Clin. Microbiol.,
January 1, 2004;
42(1):
179 - 185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Cashion, C. J. Driscoll, and O. Sabek
Emerging Genetic Technologies in Clinical and Research Settings
Biol Res Nurs,
January 1, 2004;
5(3):
159 - 167.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. P. Hochberg, D. B. Miklos, D. Neuberg, D. A. Eichner, S. F. McLaughlin, A. Mattes-Ritz, E. P. Alyea, J. H. Antin, R. J. Soiffer, and J. Ritz
A novel rapid single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based method for assessment of hematopoietic chimerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Blood,
January 1, 2003;
101(1):
363 - 369.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Borlak and T. Thum
Identification of Major CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 Polymorphisms by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Analysis
Clin. Chem.,
September 1, 2002;
48(9):
1592 - 1594.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Zimmermann, W. Holzgreve, F. Wenzel, and S. Hahn
Novel Real-Time Quantitative PCR Test for Trisomy 21
Clin. Chem.,
February 1, 2002;
48(2):
362 - 363.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|