JMD Position Available: Editor-In-Chief
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008

Published online before print October 2, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmoldx.2008.070137v1
10/6/537    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vandercam, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gala, J.-L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vandercam, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gala, J.-L.
Copyright © 2008 American Society for Investigative Pathology
Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070137


Accepted for publication July 21, 2008.


Article

Amplification-Based DNA Analysis in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection

Bernard Vandercam*, Sabine Jeumont{dagger}, Olivier Cornu{ddagger}, Jean-Cyr Yombi*, Frédéric Lecouvet{sect}, Philippe Lefèvre, Léonid M. Irenge||, and Jean-Luc Gala{dagger}{ddagger}{sect}¶||@

From the Division of Infectious Diseases,* Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Applied Molecular Technologies,{dagger} the Center for Human Genetics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery,{ddagger} and the Department of Radiology,{sect} St-Luc's University Hospital, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels; the Defence Laboratories Department, Belgian Armed Forces, Brussels; and the Department of Mycobacterial Enzymology,|| Institut Pasteur, Brussels, Belgium

@ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jean-luc.gala{at}uclouvain.be.


   Abstract

Microbiological cultures are moderately sensitive for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study was conducted to determine whether amplification-based DNA methods applied on intraoperative samples could enhance PJI diagnosis compared with culture alone in routine surgical practice. Revision arthroplasty was performed for suspected PJI (n = 41) and osteoarthrosis control (n = 28) patients, and a diagnosis of PJI was confirmed in 34 patients. Amplification by polymerase chain reaction was performed on both 16S ribosomal DNA universal target genes and femA Staphylococcus-specific target genes. Species identification was achieved through amplicon sequencing. Amplification of the femA gene led to subsequent testing for methicillin resistance by amplification of the mecA gene. Microbiological and molecular assays identified a causative organism in 22 of 34 patients (64.7%) and in 31 of 34 patients (91.2%), respectively. In 18 of the 22 culture-positive patients, molecular and microbiological results were concordant for bacterial genus, species, and/or methicillin resistance. Bacterial agents were identified only by molecular methods in nine PJI patients, including seven who were receiving antibiotics at the time of surgery and one with recent but not concomitant antibiotherapy. DNA-based methods were found to effectively complement microbiological methods, without interfering with existing procedures for sample collection, for the identification of causative pathogens from intraoperative PJI samples, especially in patients with recent or concomitant antibiotherapy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology.