| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
Published online before print May 3, 2007
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article |
@,,
,,
From the Departments of Pathology* and Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; the Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston; and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,¶ Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
@ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: shuji_ogino{at}dfci.harvard.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP or CIMP-high) with extensive promoter methylation is a distinct phenotype in colorectal cancer. However, a choice of markers for CIMP has been controversial. A recent extensive investigation has selected five methylation markers (CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3, and SOCS1) as surrogate markers for epigenomic aberrations in tumor. The use of these markers as a CIMP-specific panel needs to be validated by an independent, large dataset. Using MethyLight assays on 920 colorectal cancers from two large prospective cohort studies, we quantified DNA methylation in eight CIMP-specific markers [the above five plus CDKN2A (p16), CRABP1, and MLH1]. A CIMP-high cutoff was set at 
6/8 or 5/8 methylated promoters, based on tumor distribution and BRAF/KRAS mutation frequencies. All but two very specific markers [MLH1 (98% specific) and SOCS1 (93% specific)] demonstrated 85% sensitivity and 80% specificity, indicating overall good concordance in methylation patterns and good performance of these markers. Based on sensitivity, specificity, and false positives and negatives, the eight markers were ranked in order as: RUNX3, CACNA1G, IGF2, MLH1, NEUROG1, CRABP1, SOCS1, and CDKN2A. In conclusion, a panel of markers including at least RUNX3, CACNA1G, IGF2, and MLH1 can serve as a sensitive and specific marker panel for CIMP-high.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  L. Barault, C. Charon-Barra, V. Jooste, M. F. de la Vega, L. Martin, P. Roignot, P. Rat, A.-M. Bouvier, P. Laurent-Puig, J. Faivre, et al. Hypermethylator Phenotype in Sporadic Colon Cancer: Study on a Population-Based Series of 582 Cases Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 68(20): 8541 - 8546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. S. Schernhammer, E. Giovannuccci, C. S. Fuchs, and S. Ogino A Prospective Study of Dietary Folate and Vitamin B and Colon Cancer According to Microsatellite Instability and KRAS Mutational Status Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2008; 17(10): 2895 - 2898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Geli, N. Kiss, M. Karimi, J.-J. Lee, M. Backdahl, T. J. Ekstrom, and C. Larsson Global and Regional CpG Methylation in Pheochromocytomas and Abdominal Paragangliomas: Association to Malignant Behavior Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 14(9): 2551 - 2559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ogino and A. Goel Molecular Classification and Correlates in Colorectal Cancer J. Mol. Diagn., January 1, 2008; 10(1): 13 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. M Grady CIMP and colon cancer gets more complicated Gut, November 1, 2007; 56(11): 1498 - 1500. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ogino, T. Kawasaki, G. J Kirkner, Y. Suemoto, J. A Meyerhardt, and C. S Fuchs Molecular correlates with MGMT promoter methylation and silencing support CpG island methylator phenotype-low (CIMP-low) in colorectal cancer Gut, November 1, 2007; 56(11): 1564 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ogino, A. Hazra, G. J. Tranah, G. J. Kirkner, T. Kawasaki, K. Nosho, M. Ohnishi, Y. Suemoto, J. A. Meyerhardt, D. J. Hunter, et al. MGMT germline polymorphism is associated with somatic MGMT promoter methylation and gene silencing in colorectal cancer Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 1985 - 1990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
