| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |



From the Division of Medical Genetics,
*
Department of Pediatrics and Affiliated Regional University Pathology Laboratories, Division of Clinical Oncology and the Lymphoproliferative Disease Group,
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; and the Center for Stem Cell Research and Application,
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Peoples Republic of China
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of differentiated B lymphocytes and has remained an incurable disease. Chromosomal abnormalities are among the most important prognostic parameters for MM. Cytoplasm immunoglobulin-enhanced interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been a standard cell-targeting method for identifying genomic aberrations in MM. We have developed another cell-targeting approach by using CD138 magnetic microbeads to sort plasma cells for FISH analysis. The FISH panel consisted of four probes targeting RB-1, D13S319, immunoglobulin H, and p53 loci. We reviewed the FISH and conventional cytogenetic results of 60 patients with MM. The present cell-targeting approach in conjunction with the FISH probe panel was more sensitive than FISH performed on untargeted cells in detecting prognostically significant genomic aberrations (72 versus 24%, P = 0.0016). The frequencies of genomic abnormalities identified were similar to previously reported data obtained with the standard cell-targeting method. Therefore, our cell-targeting approach and FISH panel reliably detect prognostically important genomic abnormalities in MM and are potentially suitable for widespread use.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Cook, M. Hartke, J. Pettay, and R. R. Tubbs Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Analysis of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Translocations in Plasma Cell Myeloma Using Intact Paraffin Sections and Simultaneous CD138 Immunofluorescence J. Mol. Diagn., September 1, 2006; 8(4): 459 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |