JMD ASIP MEMBERSHIP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahony, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahony, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, S.
JMD 2005, Vol. 7, No. 5
Copyright © 2005 American Society for Investigative Pathology & Association for Molecular Pathology

Molecular Diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

The State of the Art

James B. Mahony*{dagger} and Susan Richardson{ddagger}§

From the Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, * McMaster University, and Regional Virology and Chlamydiology Laboratory, {dagger} St. Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton; and the Hospital for Sick Children {ddagger} and the University of Toronto Network, § Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) first appeared in Guangdong Province, China, in November 2002. Although virus isolation and serology were useful early in the SARS outbreak for diagnosing new cases, these tests are not generally useful because virus culture requires a BSL-3 laboratory and seroconversion is often delayed until 2 to 3 weeks after infection. The first qualitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction tests for SARS-coronavirus (CoV) were sensitive and capable of detecting 1 to 10 genome equivalents. These assays were quickly supplemented with quantitative real-time assays that helped elucidate the natural history of SARS, particularly the initial presence of low viral loads in the upper respiratory tract and high viral loads in the lower respiratory tract. The unique natural history of SARS-CoV infection dictates the testing of both respiratory and nonrespiratory specimens, the testing of multiple specimens from the same patient, and sending out positives to be confirmed by a reference laboratory. Commercially available reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction tests for SARS have recently appeared; however, meaningful evaluations of these assays have not yet been performed and their true performance has not been determined. These and other issues related to diagnosis of SARS-CoV infection are discussed in this review.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
J. Dong, J. P. Olano, J. W. McBride, and D. H. Walker
Emerging Pathogens: Challenges and Successes of Molecular Diagnostics
J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2008; 10(3): 185 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology.