| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
¶
From the Cancer Center
*
and the Departments of Laboratory Medicine,
Urology,
¶
and Surgery,
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco; and the California Pacific Medical Center,
San Francisco, California
Identification of prognostic and predictive genomic markers requires long-term clinical follow-up of patients. Extraction of high-quality DNA from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material is essential for such studies. Of particular importance is a robust reproducible method of whole genome amplification for small tissue samples. This is especially true for high-resolution analytical approaches because different genomic regions and sequences may amplify differentially. We have tested a number of protocols for DNA amplification for array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), in which relative copy number of the entire genome is measured at 1 to 2 mb resolution. Both random-primed amplification and degenerate oligonucleotide-primed amplification approaches were tested using varying amounts of fresh and paraffin-extracted normal and breast tumor input DNAs. We found that random-primed amplification was clearly superior to degenerate oligonucleotide-primed amplification for array-based CGH. The best quality and reproducibility strongly depended on accurate determination of the amount of input DNA using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based method. Reproducible and high-quality results were attained using 50 ng of input DNA, and some samples yielded quality results with as little as 5 ng input DNA. We conclude that random-primed amplification of DNA isolated from paraffin sections is a robust and reproducible approach for array-based CGH analysis of archival tumor samples.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. A. Bollet, N. Servant, P. Neuvial, C. Decraene, I. Lebigot, J.-P. Meyniel, Y. De Rycke, A. Savignoni, G. Rigaill, P. Hupe, et al. High-Resolution Mapping of DNA Breakpoints to Define True Recurrences Among Ipsilateral Breast Cancers J Natl Cancer Inst, January 2, 2008; 100(1): 48 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Vekony, B. Ylstra, S. M. Wilting, G. A. Meijer, M. A. van de Wiel, C. R. Leemans, I. van der Waal, and E. Bloemena DNA Copy Number Gains at Loci of Growth Factors and Their Receptors in Salivary Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 13(11): 3133 - 3139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Mohapatra, R. A. Betensky, E. R. Miller, B. Carey, L. D. Gaumont, D. A. Engler, and D. N. Louis Glioma Test Array for Use with Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Correlates with Loss of Heterozygosity and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2006; 8(2): 268 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Ylstra, P. van den IJssel, B. Carvalho, R. H. Brakenhoff, and G. A. Meijer BAC to the future! or oligonucleotides: a perspective for micro array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) Nucleic Acids Res., January 26, 2006; 34(2): 445 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. van den IJssel, M. Tijssen, S.-F. Chin, P. Eijk, B. Carvalho, E. Hopmans, H. Holstege, D. K. Bangarusamy, J. Jonkers, G. A. Meijer, et al. Human and mouse oligonucleotide-based array CGH Nucleic Acids Res., December 16, 2005; 33(22): e192 - e192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
