JMD ASIP MEMBERSHIP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, S. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gutman, S. I.
JMD 2005, Vol. 7, No. 1
Copyright © 2005 American Society for Investigative Pathology & Association for Molecular Pathology


Special Article

Food and Drug Administration Regulation of in Vitro Diagnostic Devices

Elizabeth Mansfield*, Timothy J. O’Leary*{dagger} and Steven I. Gutman*

From the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety, * Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, and the Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service, {dagger} Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C.

The Food and Drug Administration regulates the sale and distribution of laboratory devices under a statutory and regulatory framework that is unfamiliar to most clinical laboratory scientists. In this article we briefly describe the criteria that are used to classify and review in vitro diagnostic devices. We discuss the similarities and differences between devices that are not subject to premarket review, and those that are required to undergo either a premarket application or premarket notification [510(k)] pathway. We then discuss the methods that the Food and Drug Administration uses to assess the performance of in vitro diagnostic devices in the marketplace as a component of the total life cycle approach to medical device regulation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. S. Ginsburg, R. P. Konstance, J. S. Allsbrook, and K. A. Schulman
Implications of Pharmacogenomics for Drug Development and Clinical Practice
Arch Intern Med, November 14, 2005; 165(20): 2331 - 2336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology.