This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Müller, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Müller, A.

JMD 2004, Vol. 6, No. 4
Copyright © 2004 American Society for Investigative Pathology & Association for Molecular Pathology

Challenges and Pitfalls in HNPCC Screening by Microsatellite Analysis and Immunohistochemistry

Annegret Müller^*¶, Giuseppe Giuffre, Tina Bocker Edmonston, Micaela Mathiak, Beate Roggendorf^¶, Ernst Heinmöller^¶, Thomas Brodegger^¶, Giovanni Tuccari, Elisabeth Mangold^||, Reinhard Buettner and Josef Rüschoff^¶ and the German HNPCC Consortium German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe)

From the Department of General Surgery, * University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; the Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Italy; the Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the Department of Pathology and the Department of Human Genetics, ^|| University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; the Department of Pathology, ^¶ Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) accounts for approximately 2 to 4% of the total colorectal cancer burden. For economic reasons a diagnostic "stepladder" is recommended. After evaluation of the family history, diagnostic microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis has found its place as a valuable screening tool for HNPCC. Immunohistochemical analysis can help to pinpoint the affected gene. The detection of a mutation in one of the responsible mismatch repair gene confirmed the diagnosis HNPCC. Here we demonstrate our experience of some important pitfalls that will be discussed in this study. In MSI testing, one potential source for false-negative results is intralesional heterogeneity. We demonstrate examples of a flat adenoma and a carcinoma, which required laser microdissection to correctly determine the microsatellite status. In these lesions manual microdissection, the most frequently applied method, was not sufficient. However, the number of cells obtained by using laser microdisssection can fall below a necessary minimum, which can also cause false-negative results of MSI analysis, as shown here in a mucinous carcinoma. In addition, evaluation of immunohistochemically stained tissue slides requires experience to avoid false-positive or false-negative interpretation. A case with two synchronous colorectal cancers revealed loss of MSH2 expression in one carcinoma, whereas the second carcinoma stained positively leading to a false-negative interpretation. In some cases, false-positive results can be obtained, if a perinuclear-staining pattern is interpreted as positive. In summary, there are several potential pitfalls in the molecular screening for HNPCC. Therefore the importance of correct interpretation of clinical data, immunohistochemistry, and microsatellite analysis in combination, performed by a pathologist with experience in molecular genetics is essential. In addition, laser microdissection of tumor areas that have been chosen by a pathologist is highly recommended in cases that cannot be resolved with manual microdissection.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Giuffre, A. Muller, T. Brodegger, T. Bocker-Edmonston, J. Gebert, M. Kloor, W. Dietmaier, F. Kullmann, R. Buttner, G. Tuccari, et al. Microsatellite Analysis of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer-Associated Colorectal Adenomas by Laser-Assisted Microdissection: Correlation with Mismatch Repair Protein Expression Provides New Insights in Early Steps of Tumorigenesis J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2005; 7(2): 160 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]