JMD ASIP MEMBERSHIP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merchant, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Viswanatha, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merchant, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Viswanatha, D. S.
JMD 2004, Vol. 6, No. 3
Copyright © 2004 American Society for Investigative Pathology & Association for Molecular Pathology

Consultations in Molecular Diagnostics

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Identifies Cryptic t(16;16)(p13;q22) Masked By del(16)(q22) in a Case of AML-M4 Eo

Shakil H. Merchant*{dagger}, Skip Haines{ddagger}, Bryan Hall*, John Hozier*{ddagger} and David S. Viswanatha*{ddagger}

From the Department of Pathology, * University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Veterans Administration Medical Center, {dagger} and Tricove Reference Laboratory, {ddagger} Albuquerque, New Mexico

Abstract

We report a patient presenting with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-M4 Eo, in whom conventional cytogenetic analysis revealed a 46, XY, del(16)(q22) karyotype. Molecular analysis of the bone marrow cells using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) identified a CBFß-MYH11, "type A" fusion transcript. However, despite a thorough reevaluation, a balanced chromosome 16 abnormality could not be definitively identified by cytogenetics. Since there exists a small possibility of obtaining a false-positive PCR result, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using dual-color, break-apart probes for CBFß was performed to elucidate the mechanism of fusion gene formation and thus confirm the RT-PCR results. FISH analysis clearly revealed a cryptic t(16;16), which was probably masked by the del(16)(q22). FISH is the preferred diagnostic procedure to elucidate the CBFß-MYH11 fusion in this situation, and resolves the possibility of both false-positive and false-negative results with RT-PCR technique. Due to the improved prognosis of AML associated with the CBFß-MYH11 fusion compared to AML generally, we recommend the use of FISH for detection of inv(16)/t(16;16)/CBFß-MYH11 in patients with failed, complex, or apparently normal cytogenetics, and in whom the cell morphology indicates the strong possibility of this gene fusion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 haematolHome page
A. Pulsoni, S. Iacobelli, M. Bernardi, M. Borgia, A. Camera, N. Cantore, F. Di Raimondo, P. Fazi, F. Ferrara, F. Leoni, et al.
M4 acute myeloid leukemia: the role of eosinophilia and cytogenetics in treatment response and survival. The GIMEMA experience
Haematologica, July 1, 2008; 93(7): 1025 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology.