JMD Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Originally published online as doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080143 on February 5, 2009

Published online before print February 5, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmoldx.2009.080143v1
11/2/109    most recent
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ohgaki, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ohgaki, H.
Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 2009, Vol. 11, No. 2
Copyright © 2009 American Society for Investigative Pathology & Association for Molecular Pathology
DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080143


Technical Advances

Whole Genome Amplification for Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Using DNA Extracted from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Histological Sections

Jian Huang*, Jesse Pang{dagger}, Takuya Watanabe*, Ho-Keung Ng{dagger} and Hiroko Ohgaki*

From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, * Lyon, France; and the Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, {dagger} Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is useful to assess genome-wide chromosomal imbalance, but the requirement for relatively large amounts of DNA can be a limitation, in particular for samples extracted from small tumor areas on paraffin sections. Whole genome amplification (WGA) can be performed before array CGH to obtain sufficient DNA, but the possibility of artifacts attributable to biased amplification cannot be excluded. We optimized the WGA protocol to generate sufficient DNA with minimum amplification bias. Using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histological sections of tumors carrying known TP53 mutations, LOH 1p, LOH 10q, LOH 19q, and EGFR amplification, we first optimized the protocol so that these genetic alterations were detected after WGA. We found that a ligation step before WGA is important because it allows a short reaction time with Phi29 to generate WGA-DNA with greatly decreased amplification bias. Using template >150 ng of DNA, a ligation step before WGA, and a short reaction time with Phi29 DNA polymerase (<1.5 hours), we obtained WGA-DNA (>4 µg) with minimum amplification bias (less than threefold). Using this protocol, we performed array CGH (Agilent 105K) before and after WGA. Pearson correlation analysis indicated a significant positive correlation in array CGH results between DNA before and after WGA (P < 0.0001). These results suggest that genetic analyses are possible using WGA-DNA extracted from paraffin sections, but that they should be performed with a carefully optimized and controlled protocol.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology.